NABARD Grade A Current Affairs — 15 August 2026

2 topics · NABARD Grade A · 15 August 2026
Jal Jeevan Mission at seven: rural tap coverage rises from 16.7% to 82%
●●

Jal Jeevan Mission at seven: rural tap coverage rises from 16.7% to 82%

What happened

Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM), launched on August 15, 2019, completes seven years of implementation targeting functional household tap connections (FHTCs) in rural India. Coverage has surged from 16.7% (3.23 crore households) at launch to over 82% as of 2025. The mission operates under the Ministry of Jal Shakti with a target of providing safe drinking water to all 19.35 crore rural households. It follows a demand-driven, community-managed approach co-funded by Centre and States.

Why it matters

Jal Jeevan Mission is India's flagship drinking water scheme under the Ministry of Jal Shakti, announced by PM Modi on Independence Day 2019. It replaced the earlier National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP). The mission's core objective is 'Har Ghar Jal' — ensuring every rural household receives 55 litres per capita per day (LPCD) of potable water through a Functional Household Tap Connection (FHTC).

The financial architecture is critical for exam purposes: the Centre-State funding ratio is 90:10 for Himalayan and North-Eastern States, and 50:50 for other States; for Union Territories without legislature, 100% central funding applies.

JJM operates through Village Action Plans (VAPs) and relies on Village Water and Sanitation Committees (VWSCs) or Pani Samitis for local management — making it a decentralised, community-led model aligned with Panchayati Raj institutions.

From a NABARD perspective, JJM intersects with rural infrastructure financing. NABARD provides financial support for water infrastructure in rural areas under its infrastructure development mandate. From a UPSC lens, JJM exemplifies cooperative federalism, SDG-6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) alignment, and social infrastructure delivery. The mission also has a special thrust on quality-affected, aspirational districts, and Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe majority villages — making it equity-sensitive in design.
🔒
Key figure and date from this topic
Specific number or threshold to remember
Policy or regulatory implication
Open in Crux app
Read full analysis →
CAG flags ₹401 crore in GST non-compliance across works and construction

CAG flags ₹401 crore in GST non-compliance across works and construction

What happened

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) detected 1,334 cases of GST non-compliance in the works contract and construction sector, involving ₹401 crore. Works contracts under GST attract a standard rate of 12% for government projects and 18% for commercial construction. CAG audits routinely expose under-reporting of GST liability, incorrect input tax credit claims, and misclassification of contract types — all of which distort government revenue and affect rural infrastructure financing channelled through NABARD.

Why it matters

Works contracts under GST are a composite supply — combining goods (materials) and services (labour/construction). GST law treats them as a service supply, taxed at 12% for contracts involving the government, government authorities, or government entities for public interest projects, and at 18% for commercial construction. This distinction is critical and frequently exploited for non-compliance.

CAG's detection of 1,334 non-compliance cases worth ₹401 crore points to three main violation types: (1) incorrect GST rate application — contractors billing at 12% for projects that qualify at 18%; (2) wrongful input tax credit (ITC) claims on exempted supplies; and (3) misclassification of contracts to avail concessional rates.

For NABARD aspirants, the significance is direct. NABARD finances rural infrastructure — roads, irrigation, warehouses, cold chains — through its Rural Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF). These are predominantly works contracts. GST leakages in this sector reduce the effective tax base, tighten government fiscal space, and can raise project costs when contractors front-load GST risk. CAG's audit function is a constitutional accountability mechanism (Article 149) that feeds into legislative scrutiny via Public Accounts Committee (PAC), ultimately influencing how scheme funds are disbursed and monitored. Understanding GST rate structures on construction is also essential because GST exemption/rate changes directly affect the cost of rural infrastructure schemes NABARD supports.
🔒
Key figure and date from this topic
Specific number or threshold to remember
Policy or regulatory implication
Open in Crux app
Read full analysis →

← More current affairs for August 2026

Study smarter with Crux

Get Remember + Why it matters layers, spaced repetition, and paper-pattern questions for NABARD Grade A.

Download Crux free
Same day — other exams