Final Order in the matter of front running by Madhav Stock Vision Pvt. Ltd. and Others
SEBI Grade ACLAT PG ●●● High importance 25 July 2026
Final Order in the matter of front running by Madhav Stock Vision Pvt. Ltd. and Others

What happened

SEBI passed a Final Order on July 24, 2026, against Madhav Stock Vision Pvt. Ltd. and associated entities for front running. Front running involves trading in securities based on advance knowledge of a large pending client order, exploiting price movements before execution. SEBI's Chairperson/Members issued the adjudication after investigation. The order establishes violations of SEBI Act, PFUTP Regulations, and fiduciary duties. Specific penalties, disgorgement amounts, and debarment periods are detailed in the order.

Why it matters

Front running is one of the most serious market integrity violations SEBI prosecutes. It occurs when a broker, dealer, or intermediary uses non-public advance knowledge of a large institutional order — which will move prices — to trade their own account (or tip others) before executing the client's order. The front-runner profits at the client's expense by buying before a large buy order pushes prices up, or selling before a large sell order pushes prices down.

In this case, Madhav Stock Vision Pvt. Ltd. and connected persons allegedly exploited foreknowledge of significant orders, causing direct financial harm to clients and undermining market fairness. SEBI investigates such cases using algorithmic pattern analysis, call record data, timing correlations, and trade surveillance systems.

Legal basis for SEBI's action comes from: Section 12A of the SEBI Act 1992 (prohibition on fraudulent/unfair trade practices), Regulation 4 of PFUTP Regulations 2003 (specifically prohibiting front running as a fraudulent practice), and SEBI (Stock Brokers) Regulations 1992 for conduct norms. Remedies include disgorgement of unlawful gains, monetary penalties under Section 15G, and debarment from securities markets.

For SEBI Grade A aspirants, this case reinforces enforcement architecture. For CLAT PG, the principle — fiduciary breach, information asymmetry, and regulatory remedies — is testable through statutory interpretation and hypothetical scenarios.
🔒
Remember + Why it matters
The key recall facts and exact examiner angle for SEBI Grade A are in the Crux app.
01
Key figure and date from this topic
02
Specific number or threshold to remember
03
Policy or regulatory implication
Open in Crux — free
Read + Understand free forever · 30-day free trial