NABARD Grade A Current Affairs — 7 September 2026

3 topics · NABARD Grade A · 7 September 2026
RBI targets ₹7 lakh crore surplus with a 30-day VRRR, not overnight absorption
●●

RBI targets ₹7 lakh crore surplus with a 30-day VRRR, not overnight absorption

What happened

The Reserve Bank of India has scheduled a 30-day Variable Rate Reverse Repo auction with a notified amount of ₹7 lakh crore to absorb the durable liquidity surplus in the banking system. Unlike overnight or short-term reverse repos, this longer-tenor instrument signals RBI's intent to lock up excess liquidity for a sustained period, preventing it from exerting downward pressure on short-term money market rates below the policy corridor floor.

Why it matters

The VRRR is the RBI's primary tool for absorbing surplus liquidity under the Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF). Under the current LAF corridor, the Standing Deposit Facility (SDF) rate forms the floor and the Marginal Standing Facility (MSF) rate forms the ceiling, with the repo rate as the policy rate in between. When system liquidity is in large surplus, overnight rates in the call money and TREPS markets tend to gravitate toward the SDF floor rather than the repo rate, effectively easing monetary conditions beyond what the MPC intends.

A 30-day VRRR addresses this by absorbing surplus funds for a longer tenor, reducing the stock of free-floating liquidity available to banks on a day-to-day basis. This keeps the weighted average call rate (WACR) — RBI's operating target — anchored closer to the repo rate rather than drifting toward the SDF floor.

The 'variable rate' aspect means banks competitively bid the rate at which they park funds with RBI; RBI accepts bids at or above the SDF rate. This is distinct from a fixed rate reverse repo, where RBI sets the rate unilaterally. The 30-day tenor (versus the 3- or 14-day VRRR used routinely) signals that RBI views the surplus as durable — structural, not transient — requiring longer-duration sterilisation. This tool sits within the broader framework of liquidity management operations (LMOs) and complements open market operations (OMOs) and forex swap auctions as sterilisation instruments.
🔒
Key figure and date from this topic
Specific number or threshold to remember
Policy or regulatory implication
Open in Crux app
Read full analysis →
India's 16th State Biodiversity Boards meet: governance from Kunming to the village level

India's 16th State Biodiversity Boards meet: governance from Kunming to the village level

What happened

The 16th National Meet of State Biodiversity Boards and Union Territory Biodiversity Councils convened in Chandigarh, hosted by the Punjab Governor, to deliberate on effective implementation of India's biodiversity governance framework at state and local levels. The meet brings together representatives from all State Biodiversity Boards under the Biological Diversity Act, 2002, focusing on operationalising Biodiversity Management Committees, People's Biodiversity Registers, and aligning state-level action with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework targets.

Why it matters

India's three-tier biodiversity governance structure, established under the Biological Diversity Act, 2002, is the static backbone behind this news event. At the apex sits the National Biodiversity Authority (NBA), headquartered in Chennai, under the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. Below it are State Biodiversity Boards (SBBs) in each state, and at the grassroots level, Biodiversity Management Committees (BMCs) at every local body — gram panchayats, municipalities, and town councils.

BMCs are mandated to prepare People's Biodiversity Registers (PBRs), which document local biological resources, their habitats, folk varieties, cultivars, and traditional knowledge. PBRs are among the most exam-tested instruments in this domain because they sit at the intersection of conservation, intellectual property, and rural livelihood protection.

The Biological Diversity Act, 2002, implements India's obligations under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 1992, and the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS). The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (2022) — adopted at COP15 of the CBD — set the 30×30 target: protect 30% of land and oceans by 2030.

The National Biodiversity Authority regulates access to biological resources by foreign entities, prior informed consent requirements, and benefit-sharing arrangements. Violations attract penalties under the Act. State Biodiversity Boards handle access by Indians for commercial purposes, while BMCs manage conservation at the local level.

For NABARD aspirants, the BMC-PBR chain connects directly to tribal and rural livelihoods, forest produce, and the documentation of agro-biodiversity — all of which underpin rural credit and ecological project financing.
🔒
Key figure and date from this topic
Specific number or threshold to remember
Policy or regulatory implication
Open in Crux app
Read full analysis →
India pushes to strengthen biodiversity governance ahead of CBD targets

India pushes to strengthen biodiversity governance ahead of CBD targets

What happened

Union Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav initiated discussions in Chandigarh on September 6, 2026, to strengthen biodiversity governance frameworks. The push aligns with India's commitments under the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework adopted in 2022, which set 23 targets including the landmark 30x30 goal — protecting 30 percent of land and ocean by 2030. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change serves as India's nodal authority for biodiversity-related international obligations.

Why it matters

Biodiversity governance in India operates at three overlapping levels: international treaty obligations, domestic legislation, and institutional mechanisms.

At the international level, India is a signatory to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), adopted at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, which entered into force in 1993. The CBD has three objectives: conservation of biodiversity, sustainable use of its components, and fair and equitable sharing of benefits from genetic resources. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), adopted at COP15 in December 2022 in Montreal, replaced the earlier Aichi Biodiversity Targets (2010-2020) and established 4 goals and 23 targets, the most cited being Target 3 — the '30x30' commitment.

At the domestic level, the Biological Diversity Act, 2002, and its 2023 amendment govern access and benefit sharing. The National Biodiversity Authority (NBA), headquartered in Chennai, implements this Act. State Biodiversity Boards (SBBs) and Biodiversity Management Committees (BMCs) at local body level form the three-tier implementation structure.

India's biodiversity profile includes 17 mega-diverse countries status, 36 globally recognised biodiversity hotspots (India hosts 4: Western Ghats, Himalaya, Indo-Burma, Sundaland). India's National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) provides the domestic roadmap aligned to GBF targets.

The examiner's interest here lies in the static architecture behind the news: which body, which count, which target, which convention.
🔒
Key figure and date from this topic
Specific number or threshold to remember
Policy or regulatory implication
Open in Crux app
Read full analysis →

← More current affairs for September 2026

Study smarter with Crux

Get Remember + Why it matters layers, spaced repetition, and paper-pattern questions for NABARD Grade A.

Download Crux free
Same day — other exams