Ambit Of Constructive Trust, And What Does Section 92 CPC Bring Into Play?
CLAT PG ● Lower importance 31 October 2026
Ambit Of Constructive Trust, And What Does Section 92 CPC Bring Into Play?

What happened

The Supreme Court upheld a ruling permitting a suit against a registered society to proceed under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs suits involving public charitable trusts. The Court's reasoning, however, was carefully limited: it did not hold that every registered society automatically qualifies as a trust for Section 92 purposes. Instead, it examined whether the society in question held property for a charitable or religious purpose akin to a constructive trust, making the doctrinal boundary between societies and trusts the central question.

Why it matters

Section 92 CPC is a special provision that allows two or more persons to file a suit against the trustees of an express or constructive trust created for public charitable or religious purposes. The key doctrinal question this judgment engages is whether a registered society — which is not a trust in the formal sense — can be subjected to Section 92 proceedings.

A constructive trust is not created by an express deed; it arises by operation of law when a person holds property in circumstances where equity demands that the property be treated as held for another's benefit. Courts impose it to prevent unjust enrichment or breach of fiduciary duty.

The Supreme Court's nuanced holding matters because a broad ruling that 'every society is a trust' would have dramatically expanded Section 92's reach. Instead, the Court appears to have anchored its decision on whether the specific society held property dedicated to a public charitable purpose — bringing it within the functional definition of a constructive trust — rather than on the organisational label.

For CLAT PG aspirants, this intersection of equity doctrine (constructive trust), procedural law (Section 92 CPC), and organisational law (registered societies) is a classic multi-doctrine question. The examiner frequently tests whether aspirants can distinguish express trusts from constructive trusts, identify the conditions for Section 92 maintainability, and apply the correct principle when facts blur the boundary between a society and a trust.
🔒
Remember + Why it matters
The key recall facts and exact examiner angle for CLAT PG are in the Crux app.
01
Key figure and date from this topic
02
Specific number or threshold to remember
03
Policy or regulatory implication
Open in Crux — free
Read + Understand free forever · 30-day free trial